reswqa commented on code in PR #22632: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22632#discussion_r1204491318
########## flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/dispatcher/runner/DefaultDispatcherRunnerITCase.java: ########## @@ -173,8 +175,7 @@ private DispatcherGateway electLeaderAndRetrieveGateway(UUID firstLeaderSessionI * fail. */ @Test - public void leaderChange_withBlockingJobManagerTermination_doesNotAffectNewLeader() - throws Exception { + void leaderChange_withBlockingJobManagerTermination_doesNotAffectNewLeader() throws Exception { final TestingJobMasterServiceLeadershipRunnerFactory jobManagerRunnerFactory = new TestingJobMasterServiceLeadershipRunnerFactory(1); final TestingCleanupRunnerFactory cleanupRunnerFactory = new TestingCleanupRunnerFactory(); Review Comment: > Here below similar question about dispatcherRunner whether we need it or not... (in case yes... may just add a comment) It is also necessary for this test as `dispatcherRunner` will start `LeaderElectionService` and play the role of `LeaderContender`. > where some resources are opened without closing... may be put it in try resource Done, but I didn't put it in the `try()` where `dispatcherRunner` is located because it relies on the execution of `dispatcherLeaderElectionService. isLeader (UUID. randomUUID()). get().` and I don't want to include logic unrelated to object creation in the try statement. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org