[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17734207#comment-17734207
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-32379:
------------------------------------------
There seem to be some differences in the bytecode w.r.t. constructors; this
exemption is added with Java8, but removed on 11+:
{code}
Constructor
<org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.FileSource.<init>([Lorg.apache.flink.core.fs.Path;,
org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.enumerate.FileEnumerator$Provider,
org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.assigners.FileSplitAssigner$Provider,
org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.reader.BulkFormat,
org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.ContinuousEnumerationSettings,
org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.FileSource$1)> has parameter of type
<[Lorg.apache.flink.core.fs.Path;> in (FileSource.java:0)
{code}
Note the {{org.apache.flink.connector.file.src.FileSource$1}} constructor
argument, which doesn't actually exist in the source.
> Skip archunit tests in java1X-target profiles
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-32379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32379
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Technical Debt
> Components: Build System
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> When compiling to Java 11/17 byte code archunit fails; not sure why. Maybe it
> finds more/less stuff or signatures are represented differently.
> In any case let's use the Java 8 bytecode version as the "canonical" version
> and skip archunit otherwise.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
