lindong28 commented on code in PR #22670: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22670#discussion_r1246557482
########## flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/sink/coordinator/SinkCoordinator.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.flink.runtime.sink.coordinator; + +import org.apache.flink.annotation.Internal; +import org.apache.flink.annotation.VisibleForTesting; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.OperatorID; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.CoordinatorStore; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.OperatorCoordinator; +import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.OperatorEvent; + +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +import javax.annotation.Nullable; + +import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream; +import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream; +import java.io.ObjectInputStream; +import java.io.ObjectOutputStream; +import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture; + +/** + * The default implementation of the {@link OperatorCoordinator} for the {@link + * org.apache.flink.api.connector.sink2.Sink}. + * + * <p>The <code>SinkCoordinator</code> helps trigger an immediate global checkpoint when all sink + * operators are reaching end of data. + */ +@Internal +public class SinkCoordinator implements OperatorCoordinator { Review Comment: @zentol Jiangxin and I discussed the approach of adding a dedicated execution state (e.g. FINISHING). We chose the current approach because it is less invasive and simpler to implement. For example, given that FINISHING effectively belongs to what is currently RUNNING, we would need to go through the code (47+ places) that currently reference ExecutionState#RUNNING and check if any change is needed. This would introduce more complexity and make the PR error prone. I am not sure if there is extra benefit of "clarify to the runtime that this state actually exists" in addition to what this PR does. Can you help explain what is the benefit of introducing an extra execution state? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
