HuangXingBo commented on code in PR #23141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23141#discussion_r1296599910


##########
flink-python/dev/dev-requirements.txt:
##########
@@ -15,20 +15,20 @@
 pip>=20.3
 setuptools>=18.0
 wheel
-apache-beam==2.43.0
-cython==0.29.24
+apache-beam>=2.43.0,<2.49.0
+cython>=0.29.24
 py4j==0.10.9.7
 python-dateutil>=2.8.0,<3
-cloudpickle==2.2.0
-avro-python3>=1.8.1,!=1.9.2,<1.10.0
-pandas>=1.3.0,<1.4.0
-pyarrow>=5.0.0,<9.0.0
+cloudpickle>=2.2.0

Review Comment:
   Thanks for the explanation. I agree that we should try not to limit the 
upper bound of python packages. I think it is a relatively safe way to limit 
`cloudpickle~=2.2.0`. In the future, whenever we upgrade the cloudpickle source 
package under `lib`, we may need to modify the corresponding python 
dependencies accordingly.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to