[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15656777#comment-15656777
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5026:
---------------------------------------
GitHub user aljoscha opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2788
[FLINK-5026] Rename TimelyFlatMap to Process
This is only renaming, the changed Javadoc probably requires most attention
when reviewing this.
R: @jgrier if you could have a look that would be super
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/aljoscha/flink process-function
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2788.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #2788
----
commit 2a6573670c53056880dcfbdd06e14763f73d20cb
Author: Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha.kret...@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-11-11T09:57:25Z
[FLINK-5026] Rename TimelyFlatMap to Process
----
> Rename TimelyFlatMap to Process
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> The method on {{KeyedDataStream}} would be called {{process()}} and the
> function itself would be called {{ProcessFunction}}.
> The reason for this is that {{TimelyFlatMapFunction}} is a bit of a mouthful
> and with the additions to the timer API and state the {{ProcessFunction}}
> could become the basic, low-level, user-facing API for cases where users
> nowadays implement their own operator.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
