[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15670169#comment-15670169
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5056:
---------------------------------------

Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2797#discussion_r88215090
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-streaming-connectors/flink-connector-filesystem/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/fs/bucketing/BucketingSink.java
 ---
    @@ -972,9 +964,13 @@ public void restoreState(State<T> state) {
         * <p>
         * This should only be disabled if using the sink without checkpoints, 
to not remove
         * the files already in the directory.
    +    *
    +    * <p>
    +    * <b>NOTE: </b> This option is deprecated and remains only for 
backwards compatibility.
    --- End diff --
    
    no, i mean the actual javadoc annotation, the javadoc should be as follows:
    ```
    /**
         * Disable cleanup of leftover in-progress/pending files when the sink 
is opened.
         *
         * <p>
         * This should only be disabled if using the sink without checkpoints, 
to not remove
         * the files already in the directory.
         *
         * @deprecated This option remains only for backwards compatibility and 
has no effect.
         */
    ```


> BucketingSink deletes valid data when checkpoint notification is slow.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5056
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5056
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: filesystem-connector
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.3
>            Reporter: Kostas Kloudas
>            Assignee: Kostas Kloudas
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> Currently if BucketingSink receives no data after a checkpoint and then a 
> notification about a previous checkpoint arrives, it clears its state. This 
> can 
> lead to not committing valid data about intermediate checkpoints for whom
> a notification has not arrived yet. As a simple sequence that illustrates the 
> problem:
> -> input data 
> -> snapshot(0) 
> -> input data
> -> snapshot(1)
> -> no data
> -> notifyCheckpointComplete(0)
> the last will clear the state of the Sink without committing as final the 
> data 
> that arrived for checkpoint 1.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to