[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17827528#comment-17827528
]
Galen Warren commented on FLINK-34696:
--------------------------------------
Yes, the issue is recoverability. However, there is one thing you can do.
Create a separate bucket in GCP for temporary files and initialize the
filesystem configuration (via FileSystem.initialize) with
*_[gs.writer.temporary.bucket.name|http://gs.writer.temporary.bucket.name/]_*
set to the name of that bucket. This will cause the GSRecoverableWriter to
write intermediate/temporary files to that bucket instead of the "real" bucket.
Then, you can apply a TTL[ lifecycle policy
|https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/lifecycle]to the temporary bucket to
have files be deleted after whatever TTL you want.
If you try to recover to a check/savepoint farther back in time than that TTL
interval, the recovery will probably fail, but this will let you dial in
whatever recoverability period you want, i.e. longer (at higher storage cost)
or shorter (at lower storage cost).
> GSRecoverableWriterCommitter is generating excessive data blobs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-34696
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34696
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Connectors / FileSystem
> Reporter: Simon-Shlomo Poil
> Priority: Major
>
> The `composeBlobs` method in
> `org.apache.flink.fs.gs.writer.GSRecoverableWriterCommitter` is designed to
> merge multiple small blobs into a single large blob using Google Cloud
> Storage's compose method. This process is iterative, combining the result
> from the previous iteration with 31 new blobs until all blobs are merged.
> Upon completion of the composition, the method proceeds to remove the
> temporary blobs.
> *Issue:*
> This methodology results in significant, unnecessary data storage consumption
> during the blob composition process, incurring considerable costs due to
> Google Cloud Storage pricing models.
> *Example to Illustrate the Problem:*
> - Initial state: 64 blobs, each 1 GB in size (totaling 64 GB).
> - After 1st step: 32 blobs are merged into a single blob, increasing total
> storage to 96 GB (64 original + 32 GB new).
> - After 2nd step: The newly created 32 GB blob is merged with 31 more blobs,
> raising the total to 159 GB.
> - After 3rd step: The final blob is merged, culminating in a total of 223 GB
> to combine the original 64 GB of data. This results in an overhead of 159 GB.
> *Impact:*
> This inefficiency has a profound impact, especially at scale, where terabytes
> of data can incur overheads in the petabyte range, leading to unexpectedly
> high costs. Additionally, we have observed an increase in storage exceptions
> thrown by the Google Storage library, potentially linked to this issue.
> *Suggested Solution:*
> To mitigate this problem, we propose modifying the `composeBlobs` method to
> immediately delete source blobs once they have been successfully combined.
> This change could significantly reduce data duplication and associated costs.
> However, the implications for data recovery and integrity need careful
> consideration to ensure that this optimization does not compromise the
> ability to recover data in case of a failure during the composition process.
> *Steps to Reproduce:*
> 1. Initiate the blob composition process in an environment with a significant
> number of blobs (e.g., 64 blobs of 1 GB each).
> 2. Observe the temporary increase in data storage as blobs are iteratively
> combined.
> 3. Note the final amount of data storage used compared to the initial total
> size of the blobs.
> *Expected Behavior:*
> The blob composition process should minimize unnecessary data storage use,
> efficiently managing resources to combine blobs without generating excessive
> temporary data overhead.
> *Actual Behavior:*
> The current implementation results in significant temporary increases in data
> storage, leading to high costs and potential system instability due to
> frequent storage exceptions.
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
