[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17831336#comment-17831336
 ] 

Zhu Zhu commented on FLINK-34565:
---------------------------------

IIUC, the requirement is to ship more user files, which may be needed by user 
code, to the pod. Supporting configuration files is just a special case of it. 
Shipping them via ConfigMap sounds a bit tricky to me.
cc [~wangyang0918]

> Enhance flink kubernetes configMap to accommodate additional configuration 
> files
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-34565
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34565
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Deployment / Kubernetes
>            Reporter: Surendra Singh Lilhore
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Flink kubernetes client currently supports a fixed number of files 
> (flink-conf.yaml, logback-console.xml, log4j-console.properties) in the JM 
> and TM Pod ConfigMap. In certain scenarios, particularly in app mode, 
> additional configuration files are required for jobs to run successfully. 
> Presently, users must resort to workarounds to include dynamic configuration 
> files in the JM and TM. This proposed improvement allows users to easily add 
> extra files by configuring the 
> '{*}kubernetes.flink.configmap.additional.resources{*}' property. Users can 
> provide a semicolon-separated list of local files in the client Flink config 
> directory that should be included in the Flink ConfigMap.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to