dmvk commented on code in PR #24680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24680#discussion_r1571177099


##########
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/adaptive/CreatingExecutionGraphTest.java:
##########
@@ -166,18 +170,19 @@ static class MockCreatingExecutionGraphContext extends 
MockStateWithoutExecution
                 new StateValidator<>("Executing");
 
         private Function<
-                        
CreatingExecutionGraph.ExecutionGraphWithVertexParallelism,
-                        CreatingExecutionGraph.AssignmentResult>
+                CreatingExecutionGraph.ExecutionGraphWithVertexParallelism,
+                CreatingExecutionGraph.AssignmentResult>
                 tryToAssignSlotsFunction =
-                        e -> 
CreatingExecutionGraph.AssignmentResult.success(e.getExecutionGraph());
+                e -> 
CreatingExecutionGraph.AssignmentResult.success(e.getExecutionGraph());
 
         private GlobalFailureHandler globalFailureHandler =
                 t -> {
                     // No-op.
                 };
 
         public void setExpectWaitingForResources() {
-            waitingForResourcesStateValidator.expectInput((none) -> {});
+            waitingForResourcesStateValidator.expectInput((none) -> {

Review Comment:
   uuh, what's happening here 🤔 did we update formatter?



##########
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/adaptive/AdaptiveSchedulerTest.java:
##########
@@ -1783,56 +1778,6 @@ void testStopWithSavepointFailsInIllegalState() throws 
Exception {
                 .withCauseInstanceOf(CheckpointException.class);
     }
 
-    @Test
-    void testSavepointFailsWhenBlockingEdgeExists() throws Exception {

Review Comment:
   do you know why / when this was introduced? it indeed doesn't seem to be 
related AS; is this tested somewhere else?



##########
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/adaptive/CreatingExecutionGraphTest.java:
##########
@@ -93,8 +93,12 @@ void 
testNotPossibleSlotAssignmentTransitionsToWaitingForResources() {
                 ignored -> 
CreatingExecutionGraph.AssignmentResult.notPossible());
         context.setExpectWaitingForResources();
 
+        final StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph executionGraph = new 
StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph();
+
         executionGraphWithVertexParallelismFuture.complete(
-                getGraph(new StateTrackingMockExecutionGraph()));
+                getGraph(executionGraph));
+
+        
assertThat(executionGraph.getState()).isEqualTo(JobStatus.INITIALIZING);

Review Comment:
   iiuc, the graph would be running before the change; makes sense



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to