[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17846838#comment-17846838
 ] 

Matthias Pohl commented on FLINK-20392:
---------------------------------------

This discussion feels similar to our efforts around migrating to JUnit5 and 
assertj as the standard JUnit tests. It costed (and is still costing) quite a 
bit of resources with the risk of missing things when reviewing the tests.
That is why I still see value in just keeping both options around. That 
requires less resources and we're not losing much. The pros and cons are still 
a good guideline for developers to decide on which technology to use if they 
are planning to create a new e2e test in Java. WDYT?

> Migrating bash e2e tests to Java/Docker
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20392
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Technical Debt
>          Components: Test Infrastructure, Tests
>            Reporter: Matthias Pohl
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-deprioritized-minor, 
> starter
>
> This Jira issue serves as an umbrella ticket for single e2e test migration 
> tasks. This should enable us to migrate all bash-based e2e tests step-by-step.
> The goal is to utilize the e2e test framework (see 
> [flink-end-to-end-tests-common|https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-end-to-end-tests/flink-end-to-end-tests-common]).
>  Ideally, the test should use Docker containers as much as possible 
> disconnect the execution from the environment. A good source to achieve that 
> is [testcontainers.org|https://www.testcontainers.org/].
> The related ML discussion is [Stop adding new bash-based e2e tests to 
> Flink|http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Stop-adding-new-bash-based-e2e-tests-to-Flink-td46607.html].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to