Github user uce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2883
I agree with the renaming you propose.
I would not allow `flush()` to override the capacity limit as this has the
potential to circumvent the capacity limit with a low latency `OutputFlusher`.
Should we keep the `tryFlush` and `flush` differentiation or replace `flush`
with `tryFlush`?
---
I've tested this on a cluster and didn't run into problems. Before merging,
I still need to add some unit tests though. Most probably, this will not make
it to 1.1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
