[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17939161#comment-17939161
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-37567:
------------------------------------
I see, to be fair a few things may work incorrectly in standalone mode as it's
not very widely used. I also personally do not recommend it as the integration
is not as tight and efficient. You will lose out on features such as:
- In-place rescaling
- Autoscaler integration has limitation as the required TMs cannot be
determined
- Generally requires setting number of TMs all the time by the user (as you
cannot determine it from config)
> Flink clusters not be clean up when using job cancellation as suspend
> mechanism
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-37567
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37567
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Kubernetes Operator
> Affects Versions: kubernetes-operator-1.10.0, kubernetes-operator-1.11.0
> Reporter: Alan Zhang
> Priority: Major
>
> In general, for application mode, the Flink cluster lifecycle should be tight
> with the Flink job lifecycle, which means we should delete the Flink cluster
> if the job stopped.
> However, I noticed that Flink clusters are not deleted when I tried to
> suspend FlinkDeployment with "job-cancel" enabled. The CR shows the job under
> "CANCELED" state, but the underlying Flink cluster is still running.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
