[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15767432#comment-15767432
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5348:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3020#discussion_r93405183
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/RowTypeInfo.java 
---
    @@ -54,6 +76,152 @@ public RowTypeInfo(TypeInformation<?>... types) {
                }
        }
     
    +   public RowTypeInfo(List<TypeInformation<?>> types, List<String> 
fieldNames) {
    +           super(Row.class, types == null ? null : types.toArray(new 
TypeInformation[types.size()]));
    +           checkNotNull(fieldNames, "FieldNames should not be null.");
    +           checkArgument(
    +                   types.size() == fieldNames.size(),
    +                   "Number of field types and names is different.");
    +           checkArgument(
    +                   types.size() == new HashSet<>(fieldNames).size(),
    +                   "Field names are not unique.");
    +
    +           this.fieldNames = new String[fieldNames.size()];
    +
    +           for (int i = 0; i < fieldNames.size(); i++) {
    +                   this.fieldNames[i] = fieldNames.get(i);
    +           }
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public void getFlatFields(String fieldExpression, int offset, 
List<FlatFieldDescriptor> result) {
    --- End diff --
    
    This is the same logic as in `CaseClassTypeInfo.getFlatFields()` only 
ported to Java, right?


> Support custom field names for RowTypeInfo
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5348
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jark Wu
>            Assignee: Jark Wu
>
> Currently, the RowTypeInfo doesn't support optional custom field names, but 
> forced to generate {{f0}} ~ {{fn}} as field names. It would be better to 
> support custom names and will benefit some cases (e.g. FLINK-5280).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to