[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17946596#comment-17946596
 ] 

Ferenc Csaky edited comment on FLINK-37714 at 4/23/25 4:24 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

PR code LG, but would it be problematic to migrate the class to JUnit5 instead? 
If it is more complex, we can create a follow-up ticket, but it should be done 
probably sooner than later IMO.


was (Author: JIRAUSER306586):
PR code LG, but maybe would it be problematic to migrate the class to JUnit5 
instead? If it is more complex, we can create a follow-up ticket, but it should 
be done probably sooner than later IMO.

> KafkaTableITCase generates artifacts in main path
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-37714
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37714
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Connectors / Kafka
>            Reporter: Sergey Nuyanzin
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> to reproduce 
> {code}
> ./mvnw clean install && git status
> {code}
> Seems the reason is that {{KafkaTableITCase}} is still in JUnit4 while base 
> class {{AbstractTestBase}} in JUnit5



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to