gvijay452 opened a new pull request, #26672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26672

   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to Apache Flink - we are happy that 
you want to help us improve Flink. To help the community review your 
contribution in the best possible way, please go through the checklist below, 
which will get the contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   *Please understand that we do not do this to make contributions to Flink a 
hassle. In order to uphold a high standard of quality for code contributions, 
while at the same time managing a large number of contributions, we need 
contributors to prepare the contributions well, and give reviewers enough 
contextual information for the review. Please also understand that 
contributions that do not follow this guide will take longer to review and thus 
typically be picked up with lower priority by the community.*
   
   What is the purpose of the change
   This change allows users to dynamically pass kerberos keytab and principal 
name when submitting a flink job.
   
   Ex: flink run -m yarn-cluster -yD 
security.kerberos.login.keytab=/path/to/kerb.keytab -yD 
security.kerberos.login.principal=kerbprincipalname /path/to/my.jar
   
   Brief change log
   Continuation to this PR: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8166 by 
[jiasheng55](https://github.com/jiasheng55)
   Make applyCommandLineOptionsToConfiguration(CommandLine commandLine) a 
method of interface
   CustomCommandLine and change it to 
applyCommandLineOptionsToConfiguration(Configuration configuration, CommandLine 
commandLine), as suggested by @aljoscha
   Make org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend#parseParameters return parsed 
CommandLine
   Apply command line options to configuration before installing security 
modules
   Verifying this change
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as 
org.apache.flink.client.cli.CliFrontend...*
   
   Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no) - no
   The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): 
(yes / no) - no
   The serializers: (yes / no / don't know) - no
   The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't 
know) - no
   Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know) 
- Yes, deployment
   The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know) - no
   Documentation
   Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) - no
   If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / 
not documented) - n/a
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to