[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18018101#comment-18018101
]
Lucas Borges commented on FLINK-38049:
--------------------------------------
Any news regarding this issue?
> UpgradeMode falls back to last-state mode on HA resubmission even for
> stateless
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-38049
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38049
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Kubernetes Operator
> Affects Versions: kubernetes-operator-1.11.0, kubernetes-operator-1.12.0
> Reporter: Lucas Borges
> Priority: Major
>
> From this [documentation
> page,:|https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/custom-resource/job-management/#stateful-and-stateless-application-upgrades]
> > _* When HA is enabled the {{savepoint}} upgrade mode may fall back to the
> > {{last-state}} behaviour in cases where the job is in an unhealthy state._
> Which leads me to believe that, the upgrade mode may fall back to last-state
> if HA is enabled *and* the previous mode was savepoint. In practice though,
> if HA is enabled, the job resubmission will fall back to last-state
> regardless of the previous upgrade mode. This lead to a situation where we
> launched a job with stateless mode and HA, which after being ulhealthy, got
> resubmitted by the operator on last-state mode (unexpected?).
> I think this is a bug, and that[this
> condition|https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/blob/main/flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/AbstractJobReconciler.java#L577-L579]
> should also check if the upgrade mode is not stateless.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
