[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-39025:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Add HashMap index for InstanceID lookups in ResourceManager
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-39025
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39025
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: Natea Eshetu Beshada
>            Assignee: Natea Eshetu Beshada
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
>   ResourceManager.getWorkerByInstanceId() currently performs O(n) linear scan 
> through all registered TaskExecutors:
> {{  protected WorkerType getWorkerByInstanceId(InstanceID instanceId) {}}
> {{      WorkerType worker = null;}}
> {{      // TODO: Improve performance by having an index on the instanceId}}
> {{      for (Map.Entry<ResourceID, WorkerRegistration<WorkerType>> entry :}}
> {{              taskExecutors.entrySet()) {}}
> {{          if (entry.getValue().getInstanceID().equals(instanceId)) {}}
> {{              worker = entry.getValue().getWorker();}}
> {{              break;}}
> {{          }}}
> {{      }}}
> {{      return worker;}}
> {{  }}}
>   There is an existing TODO in the code acknowledging this.
>   Proposed Change:
>   Add a secondary index Map<InstanceID, WorkerRegistration<WorkerType>> 
> maintained alongside the existing taskExecutors map:
>   - Populate on TaskExecutor registration
>   - Remove on TaskExecutor deregistration
>   - Replace linear scan with O(1) HashMap lookup
>   Impact:
>   - Improves scheduling performance in large clusters (1000+ TaskManagers)
>   - Minimal memory overhead (one additional Map reference per TaskExecutor)
>   - No API changes, no user-facing impact
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to