Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3033#discussion_r96583281
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/nodes/dataset/DataSetSingleRowJoin.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ class DataSetSingleRowJoin(
rowRelDataType: RelDataType,
joinCondition: RexNode,
joinRowType: RelDataType,
+ joinType: JoinRelType,
--- End diff --
You are right, the check in `DataSetSingleRowJoinRule` should already
prevent this case. However, I think it is good to have an alternative check
here to be on the safe side. The translation process might be changed be adding
or modifying rules. So ideally, this check will never trigger but if it catches
something, this is a strong indication that the optimization produced a wrong
results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
