mateczagany opened a new pull request, #28929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/28929

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   On every watermark, `emitResultAndCleanUpState` will scan the full 
`leftState` of every key, which includes a full deserialization, including all 
the elements which have have higher timestamps than the current watermark. This 
work is completely unneeded, and for some specific Flink jobs, the speedup this 
new operator brings can be very much noticable.
   
   With RocksDB and ForSt, when iterating the state, the keys returned will 
always be ordered in a serialized-key byte order, so it's easy to take an 
advantage of that, and exit early from the iteration of the state.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - Add `TemporalRowTimeJoinOperatorV2` (flink-table-runtime):
     - probe side keyed by nested `LeftTimeIndexKey`
     - on RocksDB/ForSt (detected via `getBackendTypeIdentifier()`, same idiom 
as `InputSortBuffer` / `LateralSnapshotJoinOperator`), both states are iterated 
in ascending time order with early exit at the watermark
     - probe rows are re-sorted by arrival index before emission, preserving 
the exact output order of the old operator
     - unordered backends (heap) fall back to full scans equivalent to the old 
operator
   - Add `@ExecNodeMetadata(version = 2)` to `StreamExecTemporalJoin`. 
`createJoinOperator` picks the operator by `getVersion()`. Version 1 plans keep 
instantiating `TemporalRowTimeJoinOperator`
   - Add restore test fixtures (compiled plan + savepoint) for 
`stream-exec-temporal-join_2` for all four temporal join test programs.
   - Register `LeftTimeIndexKeySerializer` in `TypeSerializerTestCoverageTest`.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   - `TemporalRowTimeJoinOperatorV2Test`: all scenarios of 
`TemporalRowTimeJoinOperatorTest` mirrored with identical inputs/expected 
outputs
     - each run on both heap and RocksDB backends
     - asserting the sorted fast path is actually taken on RocksDB
     - plus new scenarios for arrival-order emission with out-of-order probe 
rows
   - `LeftTimeIndexKeySerializerTest`: `SerializerTestBase` battery plus a 
property test asserting unsigned lexicographic byte order equals numeric 
`(timestamp, index)` order.
   - `TemporalJoinRestoreTest`: version 1 savepoints restore into the old 
operator, version 2 savepoints into the new one (both on RocksDB)
   - `TemporalJoinITCase` passes unmodified; fresh plans now compile to 
`stream-exec-temporal-join_2` and run the new operator end-to-end.
   - The existing `TemporalRowTimeJoinOperatorTest` is untouched and still 
passes
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): yes
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change the checkbox below to `[X]` and replace the placeholder in the 
"Generated-by"
   line with the tool name and version. Otherwise remove the "Generated-by" 
line.
   See the ASF Generative Tooling Guidance for details:
   https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html
   
   You are responsible for the quality and correctness of every change in this 
PR
   regardless of the tooling used. Low-effort AI-generated PRs will be closed. 
See
   AGENTS.md for the full guidance.
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   Generated-by: [Tool Name and Version]
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to