wenjin272 commented on PR #971: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-agents/pull/971#issuecomment-5237177157
Thanks for taking this on @weiqingy. The PR itself looks good to me. Regarding our AI-assisted review experiment in #894, however, I found that the detailed PR description added more overhead than it removed for this particular change. Much of the description records the investigation process, such as discarded drafts and how individual repository facts were verified, rather than the final decisions that need human review. The `Behavioral contracts` also largely restate the content of `docs-only.md`; for a document this short, reading the document directly was easier than reviewing a second description and checking that the two remained consistent. Overall, for a PR of this scope and size, I do not think an additional detailed implementation description is necessary. A brief summary of the purpose, key decisions or limitations, and validation performed would be sufficient. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
