florianvazelle opened a new pull request, #29016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/29016

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request stops building pyflink Linux wheels on `manylinux2014` 
(glibc 2.17), which is end of life, and builds them on `manylinux_2_28` (glibc 
2.28) instead.
   
   - `manylinux2014` images are based on CentOS 7, which reached EOL on 30 June 
2024 
([pypa/manylinux](https://github.com/pypa/manylinux?tab=readme-ov-file#manylinux2014-centos-7-based-glibc-217),
 [CentOS announcement](https://www.centos.org/centos-linux-eol/)).
   - Dependencies have already dropped those wheels: Pillow 12.3.0 no longer 
publishes `manylinux2014` artifacts 
([python-pillow/Pillow#9528](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/9528)).
 Apache Beam >= 2.72 depends on `pillow>=12.1.1,<13`, so on CPython 3.10+ pip 
falls back to a Pillow sdist, which fails inside the `manylinux2014` container 
(missing jpeg headers).
   - cibuildwheel 3.0 also switched its default Linux image to manylinux_2_28 
([pypa/cibuildwheel#2330](https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/pull/2330)).
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - Bump cibuildwheel from 2.16.5 to 4.2.0 in the GitHub nightly workflow 
and the Azure macOS wheel job
     - Set `CIBW_MANYLINUX_X86_64_IMAGE` to `manylinux_2_28`
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a CI / packaging config update without unit-test coverage.
   
     - Nightly `build_python_wheels` on Linux should complete CPython 3.10+ 
instead of failing in `CIBW_BEFORE_BUILD` while compiling Pillow
     - Produced Linux wheels should be tagged `manylinux_2_28_x86_64` (glibc >= 
2.28: RHEL/CentOS 8+, Debian 10+, Ubuntu 18.10+)
     - macOS wheel job should still run with the newer cibuildwheel
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): yes (cibuildwheel 
2.16.5 -> 4.2.0, CI-only)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to