Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3295#discussion_r101829019
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/concurrent/FutureUtils.java
 ---
    @@ -88,4 +100,104 @@ public RetryException(Throwable cause) {
                        super(cause);
                }
        }
    +
    +   // 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    +   //  composing futures
    +   // 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    +
    +   /**
    +    * Creates a future that is complete once multiple other futures 
completed. 
    +    * The ConjunctFuture fails (completes exceptionally) once one of the 
Futures in the
    +    * conjunction fails.
    +    *
    +    * <p>The ConjunctFuture gives access to how many Futures in the 
conjunction have already
    +    * completed successfully, via {@link 
ConjunctFuture#getNumFuturesCompleted()}. 
    +    * 
    +    * @param futures The futures that make up the conjunction. No null 
entries are allowed.
    +    * @return The ConjunctFuture that completes once all given futures are 
complete (or one fails).
    +    */
    +   public static ConjunctFuture combineAll(Collection<? extends Future<?>> 
futures) {
    +           checkNotNull(futures, "futures");
    +           checkArgument(!futures.isEmpty(), "futures is empty");
    +
    +           final ConjunctFutureImpl conjunct = new 
ConjunctFutureImpl(futures.size());
    +
    +           for (Future<?> future : futures) {
    +                   future.handle(conjunct.completionHandler);
    +           }
    +
    +           return conjunct;
    +   }
    +
    +   /**
    +    * A future that is complete once multiple other futures completed. The 
futures are not
    +    * necessarily of the same type, which is why the type of this Future 
is {@code Void}.
    +    * The ConjunctFuture fails (completes exceptionally) once one of the 
Futures in the
    +    * conjunction fails.
    +    * 
    +    * <p>The advantage of using the ConjunctFuture over chaining all the 
futures (such as via
    +    * {@link Future#thenCombine(Future, BiFunction)}) is that 
ConjunctFuture also tracks how
    +    * many of the Futures are already complete.
    +    */
    +   public interface ConjunctFuture extends CompletableFuture<Void> {
    +
    +           /**
    +            * Gets the total number of Futures in the conjunction.
    +            * @return The total number of Futures in the conjunction.
    +            */
    +           int getNumFuturesTotal();
    +
    +           /**
    +            * Gets the number of Futures in the conjunction that are 
already complete.
    +            * @return The number of Futures in the conjunction that are 
already complete
    +            */
    +           int getNumFuturesCompleted();
    +   }
    +
    +   /**
    +    * The implementation of the {@link ConjunctFuture}.
    +    * 
    +    * <p>Implementation notice: The member fields all have package-private 
access, because they are
    +    * either accessed by an inner subclass or by the enclosing class.
    +    */
    +   private static class ConjunctFutureImpl extends 
FlinkCompletableFuture<Void> implements ConjunctFuture {
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, with set rather then add it should work. Since the list gets 
initialized with an array, I would actually just use an array in the first 
place.
    
    Followup ;-)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to