[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15878347#comment-15878347
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5881:
---------------------------------------
Github user wuchong commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3389#discussion_r102475557
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/codegen/calls/ScalarFunctionCallGen.scala
---
@@ -48,10 +48,16 @@ class ScalarFunctionCallGen(
.getOrElse(throw new CodeGenException("No matching signature
found."))
val resultClass = getResultTypeClass(scalarFunction, matchingSignature)
+ // zip for variable signatures
+ var paramToOperands = matchingSignature.zip(operands)
+ var i = paramToOperands.length
+ while (i < operands.length) {
+ paramToOperands = paramToOperands :+ (matchingSignature.head,
operands(i))
--- End diff --
Why take head of `matchingSignature`? Isn't the vararg the last one of
signatures ?
And I think we should take the component type of the vararg array type to
be the operand class.
> ScalarFunction(UDF) should support variable types and variable arguments
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5881
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5881
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Zhuoluo Yang
> Assignee: Zhuoluo Yang
>
> As a sub-task of FLINK-5826. We would like to support the ScalarFunction
> first and make the review a little bit easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
