[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15897129#comment-15897129 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4565: --------------------------------------- Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2870#discussion_r104393386 --- Diff: flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/expressions/ScalarFunctionsTest.scala --- @@ -1101,6 +1101,45 @@ class ScalarFunctionsTest extends ExpressionTestBase { "true") } + @Test + def testInExpressions(): Unit = { + testTableApi( --- End diff -- Yes, we can also create a follow-up issue for that. But since we are not only building a SQL API but also a Table API, POJOs will occur very frequently and everywhere. We should support them as good as we can. > Support for SQL IN operator > --------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-4565 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4565 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table API & SQL > Reporter: Timo Walther > Assignee: Dmytro Shkvyra > > It seems that Flink SQL supports the uncorrelated sub-query IN operator. But > it should also be available in the Table API and tested. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)