[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15899233#comment-15899233
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5824:
---------------------------------------

Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3468
  
    I would prefer to keep the value in `ConfigConstants`, just because it 
clearly defines in one place what we want to use as the default (rather than 
passing `StandardCharsets.UTF_8` everywhere).
    
    As for the name, I think both suggestions are fine in the end. It is 
unlikely that we ever switch the charset, especially since checkpoints and 
high-availability storage encodes data in that charset.
    
    What would be good to have is a test that checks that we never use a byte 
conversion without a charset. Maybe a checkstyle rule. If that does not work, 
we can try and do a `Reflections` test (see RpcCompletenessTest for an example 
of how to reflectively analyze code in tests).


> Fix String/byte conversions without explicit encoding
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5824
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Python API, Queryable State, State Backends, 
> Checkpointing, Webfrontend
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>            Assignee: Dawid Wysakowicz
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> In a couple of places we convert Strings to bytes and bytes back to Strings 
> without explicitly specifying an encoding. This can lead to problems when 
> client and server default encodings differ.
> The task of this JIRA is to go over the whole project and look for 
> conversions where we don't specify an encoding and fix it to specify UTF-8 
> explicitly.
> For starters, we can {{grep -R 'getBytes()' .}}, which already reveals many 
> problematic places.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to