Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3503
That sounds reasonable!
On Mar 10, 2017 4:07 PM, "Jincheng Sun" <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> Hi,@StephanEwen <https://github.com/StephanEwen>, Thanks a lot for your
> comment. I seriously think about where to add the test more is reasonable,
> because the change of this PR is OperatorStateBackend, so I added the
> test case injava/ src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/
> operatorStateBackendTest.java Is this make sense for you? feel free to
> tell me if it is incorrect.
> Best,
> SunJincheng
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3503#issuecomment-285692212>, or
mute
> the thread
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABpaqtxMMNduF1zFO5Ph5Q_0A70z99njks5rkWctgaJpZM4MY8Na>
> .
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
