[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15927277#comment-15927277
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3849:
---------------------------------------

Github user KurtYoung commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3520#discussion_r106321885
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/sources/ProjectableTableSource.scala
 ---
    @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ package org.apache.flink.table.sources
       *
       * @tparam T The return type of the [[ProjectableTableSource]].
       */
    -trait ProjectableTableSource[T] {
    +trait ProjectableTableSource[T] extends TableSource[T] {
    --- End diff --
    
    It's because i want to unify the PushProjectIntoScan rule codes for both 
batch and stream mode. And once we push down project into table source, we not 
only should create a new TableScan instance, but also a new TableSource 
instance. The codes are like:
    ```
    val newTableSource = originTableSource.projectFields(usedFields)
    // create a new scan with the new TableSource instance
    val newScan = scan.copy(scan.getTraitSet, newTableSource) 
    ```
    At first the `projectFields` method returned `ProjectableTableSource` which 
is not a `TableSource`, so i let `ProjectableTableSource` inherit from 
`TableSource`. But i just noticed we can just let `projectFields` return one 
`TableSource`, and problem resolved.
    
    Will change this.


> Add FilterableTableSource interface and translation rule
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3849
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Kurt Young
>
> Add a {{FilterableTableSource}} interface for {{TableSource}} implementations 
> which support filter push-down.
> The interface could look as follows
> {code}
> def trait FilterableTableSource {
>   // returns unsupported predicate expression
>   def setPredicate(predicate: Expression): Expression
> }
> {code}
> In addition we need Calcite rules to push a predicate (or parts of it) into a 
> TableScan that refers to a {{FilterableTableSource}}. We might need to tweak 
> the cost model as well to push the optimizer in the right direction.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to