[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15855653#comment-15855653
]
Anton Mushin edited comment on FLINK-5435 at 3/27/17 6:48 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi.
We have problem in FLINK-4604 with calcite rule. In PR for FLINK-4604 I use
work around - the copy of rule inside Flink with changes.
For fix the problem in calcite I created jira issue: CALCITE-1621
I think that will be correct clean up the FlinkAggregateReduceFunctionsRule in
this issue.
What do you think about it?
was (Author: anmu):
Hi.
We have problem in FLINK-5435 with calcite rule. In PR for FLINK-5435 I use
work around - the copy of rule inside Flink with changes.
For fix the problem in calcite I created jira issue: CALCITE-1621
I think that will be correct clean up the FlinkAggregateReduceFunctionsRule in
this issue.
What do you think about it?
> Cleanup the rules introduced by FLINK-5144 when calcite releases 1.12
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5435
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5435
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Kurt Young
> Assignee: Kurt Young
> Priority: Minor
>
> When fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5144, we actually
> copied some classes from Calcite and do a quick fix in Flink. The fixing is
> actually merged by Calcite and will be included in version 1.12, we should
> update the Calcite version and remove the classes we copied.
> The classes we copied:
> 1. FlinkAggregateJoinTransposeRule
> 2. RelDecorrelator -> FlinkRelDecorrelator
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
