[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214573#comment-14214573
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1244:
---------------------------------------

Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/205#issuecomment-63294764
  
    Looks good.
    
    I assume that this is breaking binary compatibility, though. Source 
compatibility is preserved.
    
    +1 to merge it.


> setCombinable() clunky to use
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1244
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Java API
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: starter
>
> Setting the combinable property for a GroupReduce manually is a bit clunky, 
> since setCombinable() doesn't return the operator.
> A wordcount would look like this:
> {code:java}
> GroupReduceOperator output = source
>       .map...
>       .groupBy(1)
>       .reduceGroup...;
> output.setCombinable(true);
> output.print();
> {code}
> whereas this would be more convenient
> {code:java}
> source
>       .map...
>       .groupBy(1)
>       .reduceGroup...
>       .setCombinale(true)
>       .print();
> {code}
> is there a reason for it not returning the operator?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to