[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14222037#comment-14222037
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1270:
---------------------------------------
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/224#issuecomment-64086044
This change has probably a lot of implications. We may loose some
normalization of the paths by skipping that call.
Also, in commit 8b39ba9e45145a30c2b95c47d7b03bc3ed2a8a3a I played with
various versions of paths. Turns out that it is very easy to forget a slash in
the scheme part of the URL, which is currently caught by the check for absolute
paths. We may loose that as well.
The `get()` method only obtains the file system, it does not actually open
a file stream. The only important parts here are the scheme and the authority
parts of the URI. Is it any problem when interpreting the path as absolute?
> FileSystem.get() doesn't support relative paths
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-1270
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1270
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
> Priority: Minor
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
