[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated GEODE-6285:
----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> MBean names in Loner are not stable when member name is empty
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6285
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jmx
>            Reporter: Kirk Lund
>            Assignee: Kirk Lund
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> When the default member name is empty, Geode uses DistributedMember.getId() 
> instead of DistributedMember.getName() in the MBean names. If the member is a 
> Loner (no cluster) then it will mutate the string returned from 
> DistributedMember.getId() at runtime if a CacheServer or GatewayReceiver is 
> created and started.
> Example:
> When GatewayReceiver is created, Geode creates a GatewayReceiverMXBean with 
> the ObjectName 
> *GemFire:service=CacheServer,port=\{0\},type=Member,member=\{1\}*. The 
> *\{1\}* parameter value is *10.118.20.84(28927-loner)-0-6ea32c5* which 
> contains a zero where the membership port would normally be displayed:
> {noformat}
> GemFire:service=GatewayReceiver,type=Member,member=10.118.20.84(28927-loner)-0-6ea32c59
> {noformat}
> Then when the GatewayReceiver is started, Geode fails to update the 
> GatewayReceiverMXBean state to reflect that it's running because the simple 
> act of starting the GatewayReceiver resulted in the changing of 
> DistributedMember.getId() to replace the membership port of zero with the 
> port that the GatewayReceiver is now listening on:
> {noformat}
> GemFire:service=GatewayReceiver,type=Member,member=10.118.20.84(28927-loner)-5362-6ea32c59
> {noformat}
> Internally the code tries to find an existing GatewayReceiverMXBean with that 
> ObjectName and returns null. The code after that doesn't expect the MBean to 
> be null, so updating it fails. Later if the GatewayReceiver is destroyed, it 
> also fails to unregister the MBean as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to