[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16918275#comment-16918275 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-6941: -------------------------------------------------------- Commit b6e7b077f86b63ccbb52c6e383006531932cfef6 in geode's branch refs/heads/develop from Jinmei Liao [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=b6e7b07 ] GEODE-6941: move xml configuration objects to core (#3978) * GEODE-6941: move xml configuration objects to core Co-authored-by: Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@pivotal.io> * CacheElement and other xml configuration should only exists in core * use AbstractConfiguration in geode-management * keep all xml domain objects in the same package as before and keep CacheElement an abstract class. > commands/code in goede-core should use the auto-generated configuration > objects > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GEODE-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6941 > Project: Geode > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: management > Reporter: Jinmei Liao > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > some gfsh commands have started using these configuration objects for xml > persistence, and they are using the modified classes, we should move these > modified convenience methods into some utility methods and make sure these > classes are using the auto-generated xml domain objects as it is. > 1. regenerate the jaxb objects into an internal package in geode-core > 2. modify the gfsh commands in core to use these objects instead of the > objects in geode-management > 3. leave the geode-management objects intact for now. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)