[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16918275#comment-16918275
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-6941:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit b6e7b077f86b63ccbb52c6e383006531932cfef6 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/develop from Jinmei Liao
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=b6e7b07 ]

GEODE-6941: move xml configuration objects to core (#3978)

* GEODE-6941: move xml configuration objects to core

Co-authored-by: Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@pivotal.io>

* CacheElement and other xml configuration should only exists in core
* use AbstractConfiguration in geode-management
* keep all xml domain objects in the same package as before and keep 
CacheElement an abstract class.


> commands/code in goede-core should use the auto-generated configuration 
> objects
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6941
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6941
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: management
>            Reporter: Jinmei Liao
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> some gfsh commands have started using these configuration objects for xml 
> persistence, and they are using the modified classes, we should move these 
> modified convenience methods into some utility methods and make sure these 
> classes are using the auto-generated xml domain objects as it is.
> 1. regenerate the jaxb objects into an internal package in geode-core
> 2. modify the gfsh commands in core to use these objects instead of the 
> objects in geode-management
> 3. leave the geode-management objects intact for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to