[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17278286#comment-17278286
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-8901:
---------------------------------------

kamilla1201 commented on a change in pull request #5984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5984#discussion_r569651809



##########
File path: 
geode-membership/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
##########
@@ -1454,10 +1454,14 @@ void processMessage(NetworkPartitionMessage<ID> msg) {
     if (isStopping) {
       return;
     }
-
-    String str = "Membership coordinator " + msg.getSender()
-        + " has declared that a network partition has occurred";
-    forceDisconnect(str);
+    ID sender = msg.getSender();
+    if (getView().getMembers().contains(sender) || getView().getViewId() == 
sender.getVmViewId()) {

Review comment:
       Thanks for pointing this out, @bschuchardt. I removed the check.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Surviving side server forcefully disconnected after network drop
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-8901
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8901
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: membership
>    Affects Versions: 1.14.0
>            Reporter: Kamilla Aslami
>            Assignee: Kamilla Aslami
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> During a network partition, locator-0 and server-0 were partitioned from the 
> other members of the DS (locator-1, server-1, server-2 (leadMember), 
> server-3). We see the expected "Operation not permitted" Exceptions (in 
> locator-0) for the 4 surviving side members:
>  
> {code:java}
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:02.827 GMT <Geode Failure Detection thread 2> 
> tid=0x78] Unable to send message to 
> 10.108.1.130(gemfire-cluster-server-2:1)<v2>:41000
> java.io.IOException: Operation not permitted
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:02.938 GMT <Geode Heartbeat Sender> tid=0x22] Unable 
> to send message to 
> 10.108.3.134(gemfire-cluster-locator-1:1:locator)<ec><v0>:41000
> java.io.IOException: Operation not permitted
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:06.701 GMT <Geode Membership View Creator> tid=0x79] 
> Unable to send message to 10.108.3.135(gemfire-cluster-server-1:1)<v4>:41000
> java.io.IOException: Operation not permitted
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:10.322 GMT <Geode Failure Detection thread 3> 
> tid=0x7a] Unable to send message to 
> 10.108.0.192(gemfire-cluster-server-3:1)<v3>:41000
> java.io.IOException: Operation not permitted
> {code}
> As expected, we see the loss of quorum:
> {noformat}
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:11.718 GMT <Geode Membership View Creator> tid=0x79] 
> total weight lost in this view change is 28 of 51.  Quorum has been 
> lost!{noformat}
> However, we expected to see a lost weight of 38 (10 + 15 + 10 + 3) for 
> server-1, server-2, server-3 and locator-1, respectively. What we do see is 
> that server-3 gets forcefully disconnected as well – that might occur because 
> after the "Operation not permitted" Exception above, we pass an availability 
> check.
> {noformat}
> [info 2020/12/16 23:14:10.323 GMT <Geode Failure Detection thread 3> 
> tid=0x7a] Performing availability check for suspect member 
> 10.108.0.192(gemfire-cluster-server-3:1)<v3>:41000 reason=Unable to send 
> messages to this member via JGroups
> ...
> [warn 2020/12/16 23:14:11.711 GMT <Geode Membership View Creator> tid=0x79] 
> these members failed to respond to the view change: 
> [10.108.3.134(gemfire-cluster-locator-1:1:locator)<ec><v0>:41000, 
> 10.108.3.135(gemfire-cluster-server-1:1)<v4>:41000, 
> 10.108.0.192(gemfire-cluster-server-3:1)<v3>:41000, 
> 10.108.1.130(gemfire-cluster-server-2:1)<v2>:41000]
> [info 2020/12/16 23:14:11.714 GMT <Geode View Creator verification thread 1> 
> tid=0x7c] checking state of member 
> 10.108.0.192(gemfire-cluster-server-3:1)<v3>:41000
> [info 2020/12/16 23:14:11.714 GMT <Geode View Creator verification thread 1> 
> tid=0x7c] member 10.108.0.192(gemfire-cluster-server-3:1)<v3>:41000 passed 
> availability check{noformat}
> This issue looks similar to GEODE-8721 which has been fixed in 
> b7afc604b9c2fafe4388dcdcf05fc7ec49c0ce86, but the failure logs don't contain 
> the logging relevant to GEODE-8721:
> {noformat}
> Availability check detected recent message traffic for suspect 
> member{noformat}
> This has a time stamp showing the time of contact. In GEODE-8721 we see the 
> timestamp being continually updated.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to