[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906645#action_12906645
]
ryan rawson commented on HBASE-2957:
------------------------------------
why dont you shard your counters? With the perf optimizations we did
last friday, you should easily be able to support 100m counters/day
per row, just shard row-wise and you are set for scaling.
-ryan
> Release row lock when waiting for wal-sync
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2957
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2957
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regionserver, wal
> Affects Versions: 0.20.0
> Reporter: Prakash Khemani
>
> Is there a reason to hold on to the row-lock while waiting for the WAL-sync
> to be completed by the logSyncer thread?
> I think data consistency will be guaranteed even if the following happens (a)
> the row lock is held while the row is updated in memory (b) the row lock is
> released after queuing the KV record for WAL-syncing (c) the log-sync system
> guarantees that the log records for any given row are synced in order (d) the
> HBase client only receives a success notification after the sync completes
> (no change from the current state)
> I think this should be a huge win. For my use case, and I am sure for others,
> the handler thread spends the bulk of its row-lock critical section time
> waiting for sync to complete.
> Even if the log-sync system cannot guarantee the orderly completion of sync
> records, the "Don't hold row lock while waiting for sync" option should be
> available to HBase clients on a per request basis.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
