[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929950#action_12929950
 ] 

HBase Review Board commented on HBASE-3194:
-------------------------------------------

Message from: st...@duboce.net

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1184/#review1856
-----------------------------------------------------------


Gary.  Quality stuff as usual.  Patch looks great.  Is it true we need this to 
be able to run on CDH3b3?  If so, we need to pull this into 0.90.0.

- stack





> HBase should run on both secure and vanilla versions of Hadoop 0.20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Gary Helmling
>
> There have been a couple cases recently of folks trying to run HBase trunk 
> (or 0.89 DRs) on CDH3b3 or secure Hadoop.    While HBase security is in the 
> works, it currently only runs on secure Hadoop versions.  Meanwhile HBase 
> trunk won't compile on secure Hadoop due to backward incompatible changes in 
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.
> This issue is to work out the minimal set of changes necessary to allow HBase 
> to build and run on both secure and non-secure versions of Hadoop.  Though, 
> with secure Hadoop, I don't even think it's important to target running with 
> HDFS security enabled (and krb authentication).  Just allow HBase to build 
> and run in both versions.
> I think mainly this amounts to abstracting usage of UserGroupInformation and 
> UnixUserGroupInformation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to