[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929950#action_12929950 ]
HBase Review Board commented on HBASE-3194: ------------------------------------------- Message from: st...@duboce.net ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1184/#review1856 ----------------------------------------------------------- Gary. Quality stuff as usual. Patch looks great. Is it true we need this to be able to run on CDH3b3? If so, we need to pull this into 0.90.0. - stack > HBase should run on both secure and vanilla versions of Hadoop 0.20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-3194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gary Helmling > > There have been a couple cases recently of folks trying to run HBase trunk > (or 0.89 DRs) on CDH3b3 or secure Hadoop. While HBase security is in the > works, it currently only runs on secure Hadoop versions. Meanwhile HBase > trunk won't compile on secure Hadoop due to backward incompatible changes in > org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation. > This issue is to work out the minimal set of changes necessary to allow HBase > to build and run on both secure and non-secure versions of Hadoop. Though, > with secure Hadoop, I don't even think it's important to target running with > HDFS security enabled (and krb authentication). Just allow HBase to build > and run in both versions. > I think mainly this amounts to abstracting usage of UserGroupInformation and > UnixUserGroupInformation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.