[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000657#comment-13000657
 ] 

ryan rawson commented on HBASE-3580:
------------------------------------

presumably the new regionserver has a new startcode, so therefore the old one 
with the older start code cannot exist anymore, that seems sound to me.

> Remove RS from DeadServer when new instance checks in
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3580
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3580
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.90.2
>
>
> Keeping the servers in DeadServer until it reaches some maximum isn't super 
> friendly, it confuses even the best of our users:
> {quote}
> 09:27 < gbowyer> Hi all, I have apparently three dead RS in my cluster, I 
> cannot find references to them in HDFS or in ZK, how do I still report dead RS
> 09:27 < gbowyer> also the same nodes are reported as live region servers
> {quote}
> The subtil startcode difference can be hard to catch, also this behavior 
> differs from 0.20 (so old users get confused, like I did when debugging this 
> problem) and it also differs from Hadoop's handling of dead DataNodes. It was 
> introduced in HBASE-3282.
> I think this should be improved by doing like Hadoop does, removing the RS 
> from DeadServers when a new instance with the same hostname+port checks in. 
> Stack says we should do it in ServerManager.checkIsDead

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to