[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13020426#comment-13020426
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-1512:
------------------------------------------------------
bq. On 2011-04-15 20:21:01, Ted Yu wrote:
bq. >
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/coprocessor/AggregationClient.java,
line 84
bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/585/diff/4/?file=15694#file15694line84>
bq. >
bq. > This is the first code review that evolves into a design session in
my career - exciting.
bq. > I think we should relax the initial assumption.
I still think that I would go with one family, as the families are quite
separate entities as such(HTable design wise), and I don't see any usage of
doing aggregates on accumulated column families. If that is what is needed
probably suggests some schema design rethinking. The point I raised was that
the object we are now riding upon supports multiple families (which is very
relevant for scanning a table), but we don't need it as per real usage. So,
shall we support or not, this is the point of consideration.
Moreover, as the requirements are evolving (and I guess they will continue to
do so), it might change again. I am happy as long as it is moving in the right
direction.
- himanshu
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/585/#review488
-----------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-13 08:37:14, Ted Yu wrote:
bq.
bq. -----------------------------------------------------------
bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/585/
bq. -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.
bq. (Updated 2011-04-13 08:37:14)
bq.
bq.
bq. Review request for hbase and Gary Helmling.
bq.
bq.
bq. Summary
bq. -------
bq.
bq. This patch provides reference implementation for aggregate function
support through Coprocessor framework.
bq. ColumnInterpreter interface allows client to specify how the value's byte
array is interpreted.
bq. Some of the thoughts are summarized at
http://zhihongyu.blogspot.com/2011/03/genericizing-endpointcoprocessor.html
bq.
bq. Himanshu Vashishtha started the work. I provided some review comments and
some of the code.
bq.
bq.
bq. This addresses bug HBASE-1512.
bq. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1512
bq.
bq.
bq. Diffs
bq. -----
bq.
bq.
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/coprocessor/AggregationClient.java
PRE-CREATION
bq.
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/coprocessor/LongColumnInterpreter.java
PRE-CREATION
bq.
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/AggregateCpProtocol.java
PRE-CREATION
bq.
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/AggregateProtocolImpl.java
PRE-CREATION
bq.
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/ColumnInterpreter.java
PRE-CREATION
bq. /src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/TestAggFunctions.java
PRE-CREATION
bq.
bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/585/diff
bq.
bq.
bq. Testing
bq. -------
bq.
bq. TestAggFunctions passes.
bq.
bq.
bq. Thanks,
bq.
bq. Ted
bq.
bq.
> Coprocessors: Support aggregate functions
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1512
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1512
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: coprocessors
> Reporter: stack
> Attachments: 1512.zip, AggregateCpProtocol.java,
> AggregateProtocolImpl.java, AggregationClient.java, ColumnInterpreter.java,
> patch-1512-2.txt, patch-1512-3.txt, patch-1512-4.txt, patch-1512-5.txt,
> patch-1512.txt
>
>
> Chatting with jgray and holstad at the kitchen table about counts, sums, and
> other aggregating facility, facility generally where you want to calculate
> some meta info on your table, it seems like it wouldn't be too hard making a
> filter type that could run a function server-side and return the result ONLY
> of the aggregation or whatever.
> For example, say you just want to count rows, currently you scan, server
> returns all data to client and count is done by client counting up row keys.
> A bunch of time and resources have been wasted returning data that we're not
> interested in. With this new filter type, the counting would be done
> server-side and then it would make up a new result that was the count only
> (kinda like mysql when you ask it to count, it returns a 'table' with a count
> column whose value is count of rows). We could have it so the count was
> just done per region and return that. Or we could maybe make a small change
> in scanner too so that it aggregated the per-region counts.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
