[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13724533#comment-13724533
 ] 

Matt Corgan commented on HBASE-9091:
------------------------------------

I don't disagree with the need for something like this, but it's changing the 
goals of the class substantially from what it's designed for.  This is used as 
an ultra-lightweight wrapper for byte[]'s in the tightest loops of the 
prefix-tree codec where just a few extra operations like clearing a field or 
doing a bounds check have a measurable impact on MB/s througput.  While I don't 
have a benchmark at hand, all the Preconditions.checkXyz(..) bounds checks 
worry me.

Maybe an alternative is to rename the existing version PrefixTreeByteRange and 
move it over to the prefix-tree module.  Then these changes won't affect 
prefix-tree performance.  I probably shouldn't have put it in the base 
hbase-client module anyway since it's so sensitive to changes.
                
> Update ByteRange to maintain consumer's position
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>             Fix For: 0.95.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-HBASE-9091-Extend-ByteRange.patch
>
>
> ByteRange is a useful alternative to Java's ByteBuffer. Notably, it is 
> mutable and an instance can be assigned over a byte[] after instantiation. 
> This is valuable as a performance consideration when working with byte[] 
> slices in a tight loop. Its current design is such that it is not possible to 
> consume a portion of the range while performing activities like decoding an 
> object without altering the definition of the range. It should provide a 
> position that is independent from the range's offset and length to make 
> partial reads easier.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to