[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13729846#comment-13729846 ]
Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-9091: ------------------------------------- Yes, it does show through on the API. I consider it "sugar" at this point because the same features are supported using {{byte[], int}} vs {{PositionedByteRange}}. The former will be a little slower because of the extra traversal and pushes that much more into user code, but the features are identical. That's why I suggest the APIs could be extended later to support {{PositionedByteRange}} if we can't get consensus today. [~mcorgan], [~giacomotaylor], [~nkeywal], [~enis]: you've all expressed opinions about these API. Do these two classes look reasonable to you? > Update ByteRange to maintain consumer's position > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-9091 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9091 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client > Reporter: Nick Dimiduk > Assignee: Nick Dimiduk > Attachments: 0001-HBASE-9091-Extend-ByteRange.patch, > 0001-HBASE-9091-Extend-ByteRange.patch, > 0001-HBASE-9091-Introduce-PositionedByteRange.patch > > > ByteRange is a useful alternative to Java's ByteBuffer. Notably, it is > mutable and an instance can be assigned over a byte[] after instantiation. > This is valuable as a performance consideration when working with byte[] > slices in a tight loop. Its current design is such that it is not possible to > consume a portion of the range while performing activities like decoding an > object without altering the definition of the range. It should provide a > position that is independent from the range's offset and length to make > partial reads easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira