[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13751607#comment-13751607 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9283: ---------------------------------- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12600084/0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile. {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//console This message is automatically generated. > Struct and StructIterator should properly handle trailing nulls > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-9283 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9283 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.95.2 > Reporter: Nick Dimiduk > Assignee: Nick Dimiduk > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0 > > Attachments: 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch, > 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch, > 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch > > > For a composite row key, Phoenix strips off trailing null columns values in > the row key. The reason this is important is that then new nullable row key > columns can be added to a schema without requiring any data upgrade to > existing rows. Otherwise, adding new row key columns to the end of a schema > becomes extremely cumbersome, as you'd need to delete all existing rows and > add them back with a row key that includes a null value. > Rather than Phoenix needing to modify the iteration code everywhere (as > [~ndimiduk] outlined here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8693?focusedCommentId=13744499&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13744499), > it'd be better if StructIterator handled this out-of-the-box. Otherwise, if > Phoenix has to specialize this, we'd lose the interop piece which is the > justification for switching our type system to this new one in the first > place. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira