[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13751607#comment-13751607
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9283:
----------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12600084/0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 8 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6935//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Struct and StructIterator should properly handle trailing nulls
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9283
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9283
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.2
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch, 
> 0001-HBASE-9283-Struct-trailing-null-handling.patch
>
>
> For a composite row key, Phoenix strips off trailing null columns values in 
> the row key. The reason this is important is that then new nullable row key 
> columns can be added to a schema without requiring any data upgrade to 
> existing rows. Otherwise, adding new row key columns to the end of a schema 
> becomes extremely cumbersome, as you'd need to delete all existing rows and 
> add them back with a row key that includes a null value.
> Rather than Phoenix needing to modify the iteration code everywhere (as 
> [~ndimiduk] outlined here: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8693?focusedCommentId=13744499&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13744499),
>  it'd be better if StructIterator handled this out-of-the-box. Otherwise, if 
> Phoenix has to specialize this, we'd lose the interop piece which is the 
> justification for switching our type system to this new one in the first 
> place.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to