[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13797120#comment-13797120
 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-7743:
-------------------------------------

bq. Having reducers group all cells per row will not handle very large rows 
very well.

That's precisely the reason I stumbled into this in the first place :)

> Replace *SortReducers with Hadoop Secondary Sort
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7743
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: mapreduce, Performance
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>
> The mapreduce package provides two Reducer implementations, 
> KeyValueSortReducer and PutSortReducer, which are used by Import, ImportTsv, 
> and WALPlayer in conjunction with the HFileOutputFormat. Both of these 
> implementations make use of a TreeSet to sort values matching a key. This 
> reducer will OOM when rows are large.
> A better solution would be to implement secondary sort of the values. That 
> way hadoop sorts the records, spilling to disk when necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to