[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13814285#comment-13814285
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-9892:
--------------------------------------

Great. Left some comments at RB. 

> Add info port to ServerName to support multi instances in a node
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9892
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Liu Shaohui
>            Assignee: Liu Shaohui
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-9892-0.94-v1.diff, HBASE-9892-0.94-v2.diff
>
>
> The full GC time of  regionserver with big heap(> 30G ) usually  can not be 
> controlled in 30s. At the same time, the servers with 64G memory are normal. 
> So we try to deploy multi rs instances(2-3 ) in a single node and the heap of 
> each rs is about 20G ~ 24G.
> Most of the things works fine, except the hbase web ui. The master get the RS 
> info port from conf, which is suitable for this situation of multi rs  
> instances in a node. So we add info port to ServerName.
> a. at the startup, rs report it's info port to Hmaster.
> b, For root region, rs write the servername with info port ro the zookeeper 
> root-region-server node.
> c, For meta regions, rs write the servername with info port to root region 
> d. For user regions,  rs write the servername with info port to meta regions 
> So hmaster and client can get info port from the servername.
> To test this feature, I change the rs num from 1 to 3 in standalone mode, so 
> we can test it in standalone mode,
> I think Hoya(hbase on yarn) will encounter the same problem.  Anyone knows 
> how Hoya handle this problem?
> PS: There are  different formats for servername in zk node and meta table, i 
> think we need to unify it and refactor the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to