[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819288#comment-13819288
 ] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-9940:
-------------------------------------

I hadn't checked vs 0.94. Yes, these are useful features that should be 
back-ported. +1 for that.

Can't blockSize be effectively set via -D option?

I'd also like to add a --sampleSize option, at least RandomRead, because it 
runs a looong time if you're running it against a table of any size. I have 
this feature in my own branch, which I've been using locally. I have it dumping 
the times taken by individual test threads so that they can be re-assembled for 
request latency analysis.

> PerformanceEvaluation should have a test with many table options on (Bloom, 
> compression, FAST_DIFF, etc.)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9940
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0, 0.94.13
>            Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>            Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to