[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13825397#comment-13825397
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9976:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12614399/9976.v6.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:red}-1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch failed to compile against the
hadoop 1.0 profile.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7917//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Don't create duplicated TableName objects
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9976
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9976
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
> Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>
> Attachments: 9976.v1.patch, 9976.v4.patch, 9976.v6.patch
>
>
> A profiling show that the table name is reponsible for 25% of the memory
> needed to keep the region locations. As well, comparisons will be faster if
> two identical table names are a single java object.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
