[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Latham updated HBASE-2214:
-------------------------------
Description: The notion that you set size rather than row count specifying
how many rows a scanner should return in each cycle was raised over in
HBASE-1996. Its a good one making hbase "regular" though the data under it may
vary. HBASE-1996 was committed but the patch was constrained by the fact that
it needed to not change RPC interface. This issue is about doing HBASE-1996
for 0.21 in a clean, unconstrained way. (was: The notion that you set size
rather than row count specifying how many rows a scanner should return in each
cycle was raised over in hbase-1966. Its a good one making hbase "regular"
though the data under it may vary. HBASE-1996 was committed but the patch was
constrained by the fact that it needed to not change RPC interface. This issue
is about doing HBASE-1996 for 0.21 in a clean, unconstrained way.)
> Do HBASE-1996 -- setting size to return in scan rather than count of rows --
> properly
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2214
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2214
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: stack
> Fix For: 0.95.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-2214-0.94-v2.txt, HBASE-2214-0.94-v3.txt,
> HBASE-2214-0.94.txt, HBASE-2214-v4.txt, HBASE-2214-v5.txt, HBASE-2214-v6.txt,
> HBASE-2214-v7.txt, HBASE-2214_with_broken_TestShell.txt
>
>
> The notion that you set size rather than row count specifying how many rows a
> scanner should return in each cycle was raised over in HBASE-1996. Its a
> good one making hbase "regular" though the data under it may vary.
> HBASE-1996 was committed but the patch was constrained by the fact that it
> needed to not change RPC interface. This issue is about doing HBASE-1996 for
> 0.21 in a clean, unconstrained way.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
