[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13837189#comment-13837189
 ] 

Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-10070:
------------------------------------------

bq. Any particular reason, why? 
To avoid false positives due to e.g. GC... we wait for some time before we 
consider RS dead

> HBase read high-availability using eventually consistent region replicas
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10070
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10070
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>         Attachments: HighAvailabilityDesignforreadsApachedoc.pdf
>
>
> In the present HBase architecture, it is hard, probably impossible, to 
> satisfy constraints like 99th percentile of the reads will be served under 10 
> ms. One of the major factors that affects this is the MTTR for regions. There 
> are three phases in the MTTR process - detection, assignment, and recovery. 
> Of these, the detection is usually the longest and is presently in the order 
> of 20-30 seconds. During this time, the clients would not be able to read the 
> region data.
> However, some clients will be better served if regions will be available for 
> reads during recovery for doing eventually consistent reads. This will help 
> with satisfying low latency guarantees for some class of applications which 
> can work with stale reads.
> For improving read availability, we propose a replicated read-only region 
> serving design, also referred as secondary regions, or region shadows. 
> Extending current model of a region being opened for reads and writes in a 
> single region server, the region will be also opened for reading in region 
> servers. The region server which hosts the region for reads and writes (as in 
> current case) will be declared as PRIMARY, while 0 or more region servers 
> might be hosting the region as SECONDARY. There may be more than one 
> secondary (replica count > 2).
> Will attach a design doc shortly which contains most of the details and some 
> thoughts about development approaches. Reviews are more than welcome. 
> We also have a proof of concept patch, which includes the master and regions 
> server side of changes. Client side changes will be coming soon as well. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to