[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13850237#comment-13850237
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10148:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619042/HBASE-10148_V2.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.1 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to 
fail.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplicationSyncUpTool

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8200//console

This message is automatically generated.

> [VisibilityController] Tolerate regions in recovery
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10148
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10148
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.98.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10148.patch, HBASE-10148_V2.patch
>
>
> Ted Yu reports that enabling distributed log replay by default, like:
> {noformat}
> Index: hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java
> ===================================================================
> --- hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java        
> (revision 1550575)
> +++ hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java        
> (working copy)
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@
>    /** Conf key that enables unflushed WAL edits directly being replayed to 
> region servers */
>    public static final String DISTRIBUTED_LOG_REPLAY_KEY = 
> "hbase.master.distributed.log.replay";
> -  public static final boolean DEFAULT_DISTRIBUTED_LOG_REPLAY_CONFIG = false;
> +  public static final boolean DEFAULT_DISTRIBUTED_LOG_REPLAY_CONFIG = true;
>    public static final String DISALLOW_WRITES_IN_RECOVERING =
>        "hbase.regionserver.disallow.writes.when.recovering";
>    public static final boolean DEFAULT_DISALLOW_WRITES_IN_RECOVERING_CONFIG = 
> false;
> {noformat}
> causes TestVisibilityController#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart to fail. 
> It reveals an issue with label operations if the label table is recovering:
> {noformat}
> 2013-12-12 14:53:53,133 DEBUG [RpcServer.handler=2,port=58108] 
> visibility.VisibilityController(1046): Adding the label XYZ2013-12-12 
> 14:53:53,137 ERROR [RpcServer.handler=2,port=58108] 
> visibility.VisibilityController(1074): 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.exceptions.RegionInRecoveryException: 
> hbase:labels,,1386888826648.f14a399ba85cbb42c2c3b7547bf17c65. is recovering
> 2013-12-12 14:53:53,151 DEBUG [main] visibility.TestVisibilityLabels(405): 
> response from addLabels: result {
>   exception {
>     name: "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.exceptions.RegionInRecoveryException"
>     value: "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.exceptions.RegionInRecoveryException: 
> hbase:labels,,1386888826648.f14a399ba85cbb42c2c3b7547bf17c65. is recovering 
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.startRegionOperation(HRegion.java:5555)
>  at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getScanner(HRegion.java:1763) at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getScanner(HRegion.java:1749) at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.VisibilityController.getExistingLabelsWithAuths(VisibilityController.java:1096)
>  at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.VisibilityController.postBatchMutate(VisibilityController.java:672)"
> {noformat}
> Should we try to ride over this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to