[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13858267#comment-13858267
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10252:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12620750/HBASE-10252-trunk-v0.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12620750

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.1 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to 
fail.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8297//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Don't write back to WAL/memstore when Increment amount is zero (mostly for 
> query rather than update intention)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10252
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10252
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Feng Honghua
>            Assignee: Feng Honghua
>         Attachments: HBASE-10252-trunk-v0.patch
>
>
> When user calls Increment by providing amount=0, we don't write the original 
> value to WAL or memstore : adding 0 yields a 'new' value just with the same 
> value as the original one.
> 1. user provides 0 amount for query rather than for update, this fix is ok; 
> this intention is the most possible case;
> 2. user provides 0 amount for an update, this fix is also ok : no need to 
> touch back-end value if that value isn't changed;
> 3. either case we both return correct value, and keep subsequent query 
> results correct : if the 0 amount Increment is the first update, the query is 
> the same for retrieving a 0 value or retrieving nothing;



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to