[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13861856#comment-13861856
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9941:
---------------------------------------

bq. Shouldn't we keep the catch (Throwable e) here, unless that is redundant 
for some reason?

Good spotting, that appears to be a case where some text was accidentally 
highlighted under the cursor before a paste. Let me check each call site for 
those and get back with an updated patch.

bq. I see that preWALWrite() and postWALWrite() implementations are not doing 
the handleCoprocessorThrowable() handling on unexpected Throwables. Can you 
think of a reason WALCoprocessorHost should not do the same as others here?

No. I can try adding that in this patch, it's not too far out of scope, we are 
updating every upcall invocation.

bq. In my 20m row filter-everything-at-the-server test, it'd add 1.4s 
(20m*70ns) or about 20% runtime if there is at least RegionObserver registered

It also depends on the JVM. OpenJDK 7u45 on my test box has a difference of 
~50ns.

> The context ClassLoader isn't set while calling into a coprocessor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9941
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9941
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Coprocessors
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Benoit Sigoure
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.98.0
>
>         Attachments: 9941.patch, 9941.patch, 9941.patch
>
>
> Whenever one of the methods of a coprocessor is invoked, the context 
> {{ClassLoader}} isn't set to be the {{CoprocessorClassLoader}}.  It's only 
> set properly when calling the coprocessor's {{start}} method.  This means 
> that if the coprocessor code attempts to load classes using the context 
> {{ClassLoader}}, it will fail to find the classes it's looking for.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to