[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Honghua updated HBASE-10263:
---------------------------------
Release Note:
4 new configurations are introduced:
hbase.lru.blockcache.single.percentage / hbase.lru.blockcache.multi.percentage
/ hbase.lru.blockcache.memory.percentage / hbase.lru.rs.inmemoryforcemode
the first 3 enable user to config different single/multi/memory ratio in block
cache; the last one determines if preemptive mode for memory block is enabled
> make LruBlockCache single/multi/in-memory ratio user-configurable and provide
> preemptive mode for in-memory type block
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10263
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10263
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io
> Reporter: Feng Honghua
> Assignee: Feng Honghua
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-10263-trunk_v0.patch, HBASE-10263-trunk_v1.patch,
> HBASE-10263-trunk_v2.patch
>
>
> currently the single/multi/in-memory ratio in LruBlockCache is hardcoded
> 1:2:1, which can lead to somewhat counter-intuition behavior for some user
> scenario where in-memory table's read performance is much worse than ordinary
> table when two tables' data size is almost equal and larger than
> regionserver's cache size (we ever did some such experiment and verified that
> in-memory table random read performance is two times worse than ordinary
> table).
> this patch fixes above issue and provides:
> 1. make single/multi/in-memory ratio user-configurable
> 2. provide a configurable switch which can make in-memory block preemptive,
> by preemptive means when this switch is on in-memory block can kick out any
> ordinary block to make room until no ordinary block, when this switch is off
> (by default) the behavior is the same as previous, using
> single/multi/in-memory ratio to determine evicting.
> by default, above two changes are both off and the behavior keeps the same as
> before applying this patch. it's client/user's choice to determine whether or
> which behavior to use by enabling one of these two enhancements.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
